Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wp-pagenavi domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/u918112125/domains/exploit.company/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
Multiple Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities in SimpGB - exploit.company
header-logo
Suggest Exploit
vendor:
SimpGB
by:
7.5
CVSS
HIGH
Cross-Site Scripting
79
CWE
Product Name: SimpGB
Affected Version From: 1.46.02
Affected Version To: 1.46.02
Patch Exists: NO
Related CWE:
CPE: a:some_vendor:simpgb:1.46.02
Metasploit:
Other Scripts:
Platforms Tested:

Multiple Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities in SimpGB

SimpGB is prone to multiple cross-site scripting vulnerabilities because the application fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied input. An attacker may leverage these issues to execute arbitrary script code in the browser of an unsuspecting user in the context of the affected site. This may help the attacker steal cookie-based authentication credentials and launch other attacks.

Mitigation:

The vendor should ensure that all user-supplied input is properly sanitized and validated before being used in the application. Additionally, implementing a content security policy (CSP) can help mitigate the impact of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Regular security audits and penetration testing can also help identify and address any potential vulnerabilities in the application.
Source

Exploit-DB raw data:

source: https://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25808/info

SimpGB is prone to multiple cross-site scripting vulnerabilities because the application fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied input.

An attacker may leverage these issues to execute arbitrary script code in the browser of an unsuspecting user in the context of the affected site. This may help the attacker steal cookie-based authentication credentials and launch other attacks.

These issues affect SimpGB 1.46.02; other versions may also be vulnerable. 

http://www.example.com/[PRODUCT DIRECTORY]/admin/?no_rgcheck=true&lang=1&l_username=</td><script>alert(document.cookies)</script><td>